Current and Past Research
Application of Transcriptional Signatures for
Diagnosis of Febrile Infants within the PECARN Network:
The ultimate goal of this project is to incorporate a RNA-based diagnostic technology (called transcriptional signatures) to distinguish between bacterial and non-bacterial infections in otherwise well-appearing febrile infants who present to the EDs. The project aims to create a PECARN wide infrastructure for conducting translational genomic research and demonstrate feasibility of screening, consenting, collecting, and processing of small volumes of blood samples to abstract high quality RNA from febrile infants. After initially defining bacterial and non-bacterial biosignatures, we will conduct a limited validation of these diagnostic biosignatures on an independent group of febrile infants. Patient enrollment began in 2008 and continues through 2013. This project is co-funded by NICHD.
ASSESS (Age Specific Screen for Ethanol and Substance Status) aims to validate the newly developed National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) two-question screen for early detection of alcohol use and problems in 12-17 year olds in 16 PECARN pediatric emergency departments. Approximately 5000 youths presenting to participating PECARN pediatric emergency departments will be enrolled over a 3.5 year period. Subjects will complete the two-question screen along with an alcohol and other drug and behavior assessment battery. The
advantage of the PED setting is the ability to capture high risk populations such as school dropouts and those without primary care or insurance, who often use PEDs for their medical care and are missed in other study settings. This study is funded by the National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA).
This was a prospective study of children with blunt torso trauma with a goal of identifying high-risk and low-risk indicators of intra-abdominal injury (IAI). The long term objective of the study is to derive, validate, disseminate and implement decision support tools to optimize the evaluation of children with blunt torso trauma, which will lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. The overall objective of this particular study is to develop a clinical decision rule for appropriate use of abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scanning in children with blunt torso trauma. We will create a decision rule that identifies those children in need of emergent CT scan and treatment, while reducing the use of abdominal CT scans in those children with minimal risk of IAI. The study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patient enrollment began in May, 2007 and concluded in January 2010. Data analysis is in progress. The manuscript has been accepted for publication.
This was a prospective study of children with minor-to-moderate blunt head trauma with a goal of identifying high-risk and low-risk indicators of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal was to derive the evidence on which to base appropriate use of head computerized tomography (CT) in children with acute head injury, which will hopefully reduce the number of unnecessary CT scans for children at very low risk for TBI. This will minimize the exposure of these children to the significant drawbacks related to CT (ionizing radiation, transport of children away from the direct observation of the emergency department, pharmacological sedation, and additional health care costs).
The study was co-funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Program and the Research Program. Data collection began in June, 2004 at all PECARN sites, and concluded in September, 2006. The network successfully enrolled 34,000 patients for the derivation of two clinical decision rules (one for children < 2 years and one for children > 2 years), and an additional 9,000 patients to validate the decision rules. Multiple abstracts from this study have been presented at national emergency medicine and pediatric meetings to date. Several manuscripts have been published including the main prediction rule manuscript which was published in Lancet (October 3, 2009). Data continue to be analyzed and there are many subanalyses and abstracts in progress. The public use data set is available on this website.
Development of Research Partnerships with EMS Agencies and Descriptive Study of EMS Pediatric Population within PECARN:
The objective of this protocol is to study pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) within the PECARN network and establish the network’s capability to collect pre-hospital data. This is a descriptive study that will initiate data collection from EMS agencies. We plan to do this using methodology similar to the PECARN Core Data Project (PCDP). The project aims to demonstrate that pediatric EMS research is possible within PECARN and that data transmission from EMS agencies to the data center is feasible. This study will establish research relationships between PECARN sites and respective EMS agencies and gather data to understand the demographics and disease/injury patterns of the sample that is available to the PECARN network. The data collected will be invaluable in the future for generating hypotheses for pediatric EMS studies and providing preliminary data for grant applications. Similar to the PECARN Core Data Project mentioned above, this project will provide the groundwork for further meaningful pre-hospital research within the network.
Effectiveness of Oral Dexamethasone in Acute Bronchiolitis:
This study assesses the effectiveness and safety of the administration of oral dexamethasone for acute moderate to severe bronchiolitis in children seen in the ED, both with regard to the need for hospitalization (primary outcome), and severity and duration of disease (secondary outcomes). The study hypothesized that dexamethasone would be more effective than placebo in preventing hospital admission of infants with bronchiolitis.
This study was endorsed by the PECARN Steering Committee in January 2003 and was conducted at selected sites within PECARN for a three-year period (during Bronchiolitis seasons). The study was co-funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Program and the Research Program. Data collection began in January, 2004. The study concluded in Spring, 2006. We successfully enrolled 600 patients in this study, and we determined that there was no reduction in hospitalizations or improvement in respiratory scores associated with the administration of oral dexamethasone. Findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine on July 26th, 2007.
Preliminary data strongly support the concept that diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) related cerebral injury and subsequent edema may occur as a spectrum of severity. Although only a minority of children develop clinically-overt DKA-related cerebral injury of sufficient severity for obvious, profound neurological dysfunction, a much larger percentage may have subtle cerebral injury. The impact of variation in DKA treatment protocols on this cerebral injury is unknown and arguments for either slower or faster fluid treatment protocols can be made.
This study is a factorial-design, randomized controlled trial comparing four fluid treatment protocols for pediatric DKA. Two rates of rehydration will be compared; a more rapid rate, designed to promote faster reperfusion of brain tissue and a slower rate, geared toward more gradual reperfusion. Within each of these two basic rehydration schemes, we will vary the type of rehydration fluid used (0.9% saline or 0.45% saline). We will compare treatment arms using a comprehensive set of assessments for neurological injury including measurements of subtle neurological dysfunction during DKA treatment (in addition to recording the frequency of acute, clinically-overt cerebral edema) and measures of long-term neurocognitive function. These studies will not only allow us to determine whether variations in fluid treatment protocols affect acute neurological outcomes of DKA, but also will provide important additional data regarding the impact of DKA and DKA treatment on long-term neurocognitive function in children. In this way, we hope to identify a more ideal fluid management strategy for children with DKA. The anticipated enrollment period is from Fall 2010-2015. This project is co-funded by NICHD.
Implementation of the PECARN Traumatic Brain Injury Prediction Rules for Children Using Computerized Clinical Decision Support: An Interrupted Time Series Trial
Blunt head trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children. However, greater than 95% of the more than 450,000 children who present to US emergency departments annually with blunt head trauma have minor head trauma. Although important traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are infrequent, clinicians obtain cranial computed tomography (CT) in up to 50% of children with minor blunt head trauma, exposing them to radiation with its potential to induce malignancies. Given the substantial burden of blunt head trauma to families and society, as well as the importance of minimizing radiation exposure, this study will investigate whether implementation of the recently validated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) TBI prediction rules using computerized clinical decision support can decrease unnecessary use of CT in children with minor blunt head trauma. The overall goal of this study is to promote the appropriate use of CT for children with blunt head trauma by creating a generalizable model to translate evidence into clinical practice.
The study objectives are:
- To rigorously develop an integrated electronic health record blunt head trauma data collection template and computer-based clinical decision support system to implement the PECARN TBI prediction rules for children; and,
- To assess whether implementing the prediction rules via computerized clinical decision support decreases the number of (unnecessary) cranial CTs in children with minor blunt head trauma at very low risk of traumatic brain injuries.
In order to meet study objective one, we will conduct focus groups of clinicians and perform emergency department workflow evaluations; develop an electronic health record blunt head trauma template that captures patient encounter data; and develop computerized clinical decision support to provide CT recommendations. Subsequently (in order to meet objective two), we will conduct a seven–center prospective, interrupted time series trial with concurrent controls that assesses CT use prior to and after the implementation of the electronic health record-clinical decision support (EHR-CDS) intervention system. We hypothesize that the EHR-CDS intervention system will safely decrease the use of CT compared to passive diffusion. This project is funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act—Office of the Secretary (ARRA OS): Grant #S02MC19289-01-00.
Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at risk for acute vasoocclusive crises, the most frequent of which are pain crises. The usual treatment for pain crises, intravenous (IV) fluids and pain medicine, has changed little over the past three decades. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous magnesium in shortening the duration of a pain crisis when added to standard care in children with SCD who are hospitalized for an acute pain crisis. This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to receive either the study drug or placebo every eight hours for a total of six doses, or until discharge, whichever occurs first. Patients will be followed up by phone one week after discharge to assess rehospitalization rates, and will return to the sickle cell clinic for follow up one month after discharge. Data from this study will lead to a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of sickle cell crisis and provide additional insight into potential therapeutic responses invoked by magnesium therapy. The anticipated enrollment is from late 2010-2012.This project is co-funded by NICHD.
PECARN Core Data Project (PCDP):
This project is a cross-sectional study of all pediatric ED visits from all sites within the network. A database of electronic administrative data is compiled annually from 2002 to the present. This study has several aims:
- to identify the frequency and type of PECARN Emergency Department (ED) visits;
- to identify the availability of data elements from existing electronic databases and chart reviews at each HEDA;
- to identify the availability of clinical parameters collected during usual medical care of patients with selected diagnoses (asthma and long bone fractures);
- to measure the agreement between, and completeness of, data elements collected by electronic methods and chart review.
This study provides important epidemiological information regarding pediatric emergency department visits in the PECARN network. Data are collected annually from all hospital sites.
PECARN Registry: Improving the Quality of Pediatric Emergency Care Using an Electronic Health Record Registry and Clinician Feedback:
This grant was awarded RO1 funding from AHRQ. This project will establish a data registry from electronic health records at four PECARN sites to collect and report quality measures of emergency care provided to children. We will establish measurable benchmarks and implement a clinician feedback intervention to improve performance. The project will allow systematic and widespread collection and reporting of performance and outcomes and is critical to allow clinicians and emergency care stakeholders to improve care beyond the local level.
Pediatric Patient Safety in Emergency Departments:
This study focuses on pediatric patient safety in the emergency departments (ED). The first phase involved surveys of pediatric ED staff to assess perceptions of safety. The manuscript for this phase has been published in Pediatrics (2009). The second phase of the study involves transmitting incident reports to the data center and classifying and quantifying ED events using a consensus process. Analysis of over 3000 incidents reports is complete and a manuscript is in progress discussing medicaton errors/events. A newsletter summarizing findings from the medication error review has been distributed to share information on prevention of medication errors in the emergency departments that care for children.
Prospective Yield Study of Children with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Pilot Feasibility for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Progesterone for Severe TBI:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of morbidity from trauma in children, and one of the leading causes of death. Despite the frequency of TBI, its impact on the health of children, and decades of research, no effective treatment exists. For adults, however, there have been several recent phase II studies demonstrating the administration of progesterone to those with moderate-to-severe TBI is safe and may have substantial neuroprotective effects. The PECARN conducted a prospective observational yield study to: demonstrate the number of moderate-to-severely brain injured children presenting to PECARN hospitals, determine time of guardian arrival in order to determine appropriate consent methods, and evaluate fesibility of eligibility criteria. Data from this pilot will also allow us to determine how many clinical sites will be required for an interventional trial. Subject enrollment has concluded and a manuscript is in preparation.
Predicting Cervical Spine Injury (CSI) in Children:
Cervical spine injuries (CSI) are serious, but rare events in children. Immobilization of children with CSI in the out-of-hospital setting may be beneficial, but is poorly studied. In contrast, immobilization for transport of pediatric trauma patients without CSI is common and known to be associated with adverse effects. As a result, more than 99% of immobilized children have no CSI and are exposed to harm with no demonstrable benefit. The purpose of this study is to identify a set of variables that separate injured children with negligible risk of CSI from those at non-negligible risk for CSI. Specifically, project goals are to describe CSI and to identify factors associated with increased risk for CSI among a diverse pediatric blunt trauma population. This retrospective study concluded data collection at the end of 2007. Several abstracts have been presented in 2008 and 2009 at national meetings. The main manuscript has been published.
A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Patient Safety Issues in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Pilot Study in New York State:
Medical errors are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, causing
the death of between 44,000 and 98,000 patients annually in the United
States. Little is known about medical errors in pediatric patients,
especially in the emergency department (ED) setting. This project, co-funded by the New York Department of Health, evaluated incident reports and medication records in 3 PECARN sites.
To classify and disseminate information from ongoing incident report monitoring, including actual and near-miss medication errors that occurred in the emergency department (i.e. qualitative surveillance).
To monitor medication error rates using systematic sampling and review of emergency department medical records (i.e. quantitative surveillance).
Over 3,000 medical records were reviewed and one year of incident reports were evaluated for this project. A manuscript is in progress.
Referral and Utilization Patterns for Psychiatric
Related Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department:
Pediatric psychiatric emergencies appear to have reached epidemic proportions over the past 10 years. ED visits related to mental health problems are known to be resource intensive, but data in this area has mainly occurred at individual sites. The aim of this retrospective chart review was to describe the patterns of referral and utilization of ED resources for children with a psychiatric related visit presenting to PECARN EDs. The findings of this study were presented at the Pediatric Ambulatory Society Annual Meeting in 2007. The main manuscript was published in Pediatric Emergency Care (2009).
Therapeutic Hypothermia After
Cardiac Arrest in Children (THAPCA) Trials:
Cardiopulmonary arrest (when the heart stops beating) is a tragic event in children that is associated with high rates of death and long term disability. The study, entitled “Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest (THAPCA)”, will evaluate whether regulating the body temperature will improve the outcome for children after cardiac arrest. There is a separate study for children who arrest in the hospital (THAPCA-IH) and children who arrest out of the hospital (THAPCA-OH). The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is funding the first large scale, multi-center study to help determine the best treatment for children who are successfully resuscitated after a cardiac arrest.
The goal of these two trials is to determine if therapeutic hypothermia improves survival with good neurobehavioral outcome in children who have had a cardiac arrest. About 900 children will be enrolled in this study over 6 years at 30 clinical centers throughout the US and Canada. Enrollment in the THAPCA Trials began in September, 2009.
The THAPCA Trials investigative team has worked collaboratively since 2002 bringing together two federally funded pediatric clinical research networks to study this problem. The two networks are the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), funded by the Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) program and the NICHD Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Resesarch Network (CPCCRN).
Use Of Lorazepam for the Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial of Lorazepam and Diazepam
Textbooks and expert opinion recommend both diazepam and lorazepam as initial therapy for children in status epilepticus (SE) and provide recommended doses that are commonly used. However, unlike diazepam, lorazepam is only FDA-approved for treatment for SE in patients over 18 years of age. Despite this fact, many experts support the use of lorazepam over diazepam in pediatric SE. Increased duration of action, increased effectiveness in terminating SE, and a lower incidence of respiratory depression have been cited as potential advantages of lorazepam over diazepam. However, data to support firm recommendations for one medication over another are lacking. Thus, either diazepam (FDA-approved) or lorazepam can be considered first-line agents for pediatric SE, and the physician's choice of agent depends on local practice patterns and individual treatment styles.
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in efficacy and safety between these two commonly used benzodiazepines, as requested by the FDA under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, using the Exception from Informed Consent provided by the FDA.